S08v1NJR
Search
Menu
  • MAIN NJR WEBSITE
  • CLINICIAN FEEDBACK
  • SURGEON AND HOSPITAL PROFILE
  • CONTACT US
NJR NJR
 

Back to Reports List

NJR STRUCTURE & GOVERNANCE

ANNUAL REPORT 2020

Chairman’s Foreword 2020Introduction to Annual Report 2020Executive Summary

WELSH TRANSLATION

WORK - ANNUAL PROGRESS

Data Completeness and QualityWork of the NJR committeesDevelopments

HIPS

All Procedures - ActivityPrimary Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsPrimary Procedures - Surgical TechniquePrimary Procedures - ComponentsRevision Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsRevision Procedures - Components

KNEES

All Procedures - ActivityPrimary Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsPrimary Procedures - Surgical TechniquePrimary Procedures - ComponentsRevision Procedures - Patient Characteristics

ANKLES

All Procedures - ActivityPrimary Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsPrimary Procedures - Surgical TechniquesPrimary Procedures - ComponentsRevision Procedures

ELBOWS

Primary Procedures - ActivityPrimary Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsPrimary Procedures - Surgical TechniquesPrimary Procedures - Elbow ComponentsRevision Procedures

SHOULDERS

Primary Procedures - ActivityPrimary Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsPrimary Procedures - Surgical TechniquePrimary Procedures - Shoulder ComponentsRevision Procedures

ALL JOINTS
 

All Procedures - Activity

HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE

IMPLANT PERFORMANCE

DOWNLOADS

ARCHIVE


16th Annual Report
published Sept 2019


15th Annual Report
published Sept 2018

14th Annual Report
published Sept 2017

13th Annual Report
published Sept 2016

12th Annual Report
published Sept 2015

11th Annual Report
published Sept 2014

Details for shoulder revision procedures

  • SUMMARY
  • CHART AND TABLE

The table shows the number of different types of shoulder revision procedures undertaken during the previous calendar year, segmented by the procedure type and associated patient procedures. The table also shows the number of times each indication for surgery was reported, the totals for each side that revision was undertaken, and the average age of revision patients by gender.  Note that more than one indication for surgery can be reported.

Report Viewer Configuration Error

The Report Viewer Web Control HTTP Handler has not been registered in the application's web.config file. Add <add verb="*" path="Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd" type = "Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91" /> to the system.web/httpHandlers section of the web.config file, or add <add name="ReportViewerWebControlHandler" preCondition="integratedMode" verb="*" path="Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd" type="Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91" /> to the system.webServer/handlers section for Internet Information Services 7 or later.

Browser not supported

Report Viewer requires a standards compliant browser. Users of Internet Explorer 8 and earlier should switch to a modern browser, or if already using a modern browser target standards mode by adding the <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge" > header tag to the host page.

Loading...
Cancel
CSV (comma delimited)
PDF
Excel
Word

Print

Cancel

Done

❌
Detail for shoulder revision procedures in 2019.
Procedure type
Patient procedure
No.
%
Total revision procedures
 
827
 
Single-stage revision
Revision glenohumeral interpositional arthroplasty
1
<1%
Single-stage revision
Revision resurfacing hemi-arthroplasty
2
<1%
Single-stage revision
Revision resurfacing total arthroplasty
7
1%
Single-stage revision
Revision stemless conventional total arthroplasty
26
3%
Single-stage revision
Revision stemless hemi-arthroplasty
1
<1%
Single-stage revision
Revision stemless total reverse arthroplasty
39
5%
Single-stage revision
Revision stemmed conventional total arthroplasty
43
5%
Single-stage revision
Revision stemmed hemi-arthroplasty
30
4%
Single-stage revision
Revision stemmed total reverse arthroplasty
343
41%
Single-stage revision
Modular exchange for indications other than infection
59
7%
Stage one of two-stage revision
 
128
15%
Stage two of two-stage revision
Revision stemless conventional total arthroplasty
2
<1%
Stage two of two-stage revision
Revision stemless total reverse arthroplasty
7
1%
Stage two of two-stage revision
Revision stemmed conventional total arthroplasty
12
1%
Stage two of two-stage revision
Revision stemmed hemi-arthroplasty
2
<1%
Stage two of two-stage revision
Revision stemmed total reverse arthroplasty
89
11%
Excision arthroplasty
 
5
1%
Debridement and implant retention (dair)
Debridement and implant retention (dair) with modular exchange
28
3%
Debridement and implant retention (dair)
Debridement and implant retention (dair) without modular exchange
3
<1%
Indications for surgery
  
Cuff insufficiency
213
26%
Infection
158
19%
Native glenoid surface erosion
136
16%
Instability
131
16%
Aseptic loosening glenoid
92
11%
Dislocation/subluxation
89
11%
Glenoid implant wear
54
7%
Stiffness
54
7%
Lysis - glenoid
50
6%
Aseptic loosening humerus
40
5%
Unexplained pain
39
5%
Periprosthetic fracture
39
5%
Component dissociation
30
4%
Lysis - humerus
27
3%
Impingement
20
2%
Implant fracture
7
1%
Other
65
8%
Side
  
Left
349
42%
Right
478
58%
Total shoulder revision procedures with patient data
801
97%
Female age
435
54%
Average
71.18
 
SD
10.75
 
Interquartile range
65.21-78.67
 
Male age
366
46%
Average
67.66
 
SD
11.45
 
Interquartile range
61.12-75.54
 
© National Joint Registry 2020

Reporting Period

Date Range

Data to 31/12/2013

Data to 31/12/2014

Data to 31/12/2015

Data to 31/12/2016

Data to 31/12/2017

Data to 31/12/2018

Data to 31/12/2019

Filter

Calendar Year

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Reset filters


Please set a value for all filters.

    © Copyright 2014 NJR