Search
Menu
  • MAIN NJR WEBSITE
  • CLINICIAN FEEDBACK
  • SURGEON AND HOSPITAL PROFILE
  • CONTACT US
NJR NJR
 

Back to Reports List

INTRODUCTION TO NJR REPORTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ANNUAL PROGRESS

IntroductionData completeness and qualityWork of the NJR Steering Committee and its sub-committees

HIGHLIGHTS: OUR WORK

Data quality auditNJR Strategic planEconomic model and price benchmarkingMinimum Data Set v7Clinical Outcomes Publication programmeNJR Patient Reported Outcomes MeasuresNJR Feedback servicesComponent database re-designResearch data access portalNever EventsNJR related initiativesBest Practice TariffNJR Reports

HIPS

All Procedures - ActivityPrimary Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsPrimary Procedures - Surgical TechniquePrimary Procedures - ComponentsRevision Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsRevision Procedures - Components

KNEES

All Procedures - ActivityPrimary Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsPrimary Procedures - Surgical TechniquePrimary Procedures - ComponentsRevision Procedures - Patient Characteristics

ANKLES

All Procedures - ActivityPrimary Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsPrimary Procedures - Surgical TechniquesPrimary Procedures - ComponentsRevision Procedures

ELBOWS

Primary Procedures - ActivityPrimary Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsPrimary Procedures - Surgical TechniquesPrimary Procedures - Elbow ComponentsRevision Procedures

SHOULDERS

Primary Procedures - ActivityPrimary Procedures - Patient CharacteristicsPrimary Procedures - Surgical TechniquePrimary Procedures - Shoulder ComponentsRevision Procedures

ALL JOINTS
 

All Procedures - Activity

HOSPITALS

IMPLANTS

PATIENT GUIDE

DOWNLOADS

ARCHIVE

15th Annual Report
published Sept 2018
14th Annual Report
published Sept 2017
13th Annual Report
published Sept 2016
12th Annual Report
published Sept 2015
11th Annual Report
published Sept 2014

Components removed during revision hip procedures

  • SUMMARY
  • CHART AND TABLE

Data to 31/12/2018

Both the acetabular and femoral components were removed in 42% of all revision procedures. However, comparison of the different types of revision procedures indicates that both components were more likely to be removed during stage one of a two-stage revision process (81%) than during a single-stage revision (40%). This is to be expected since the majority of two-stage revisions are carried out for reasons of infection when all components are routinely removed.

Data to 31/12/2017

Both the acetabular and femoral components were removed in 45% of all revision procedures. However, comparison of the different types of revision procedures indicates that both components were more likely to be removed during a two-stage revision process than during a single-stage revision. This is to be expected since the majority of two-stage revisions are carried out for reasons of infection when all components are routinely removed.

Data to 31/12/2016

Both the acetabular and femoral components were removed in 46% of all revision procedures. However, comparison of the different types of revision procedures indicates that both components were more likely to be removed during a two-stage revision process than during a single-stage revision. This is to be expected since the majority of two-stage revisions are carried out for reasons of infection when all components are routinely removed.

Data to 31/12/2015

Both the acetabular and femoral components were removed in 46% of all revision procedures. However, comparison of the different types of revision procedures indicates that both components were more likely to be removed during a two-stage revision process than during a single-stage revision. This is to be expected since the majority of two-stage revisions are carried out for reasons of infection when all components are routinely removed.

Data to 31/12/2014

Both the acetabular and femoral components were removed in 45% of all revision procedures. However, comparison of the different types of revision procedures indicates that both components were more likely to be removed during a two-stage revision process than during a single-stage revision. This is to be expected since the majority of two-stage revisions are carried out for reasons of infection when all components are routinely removed.

Data to 31/12/2013

Both the acetabular and femoral components were removed in 46% of all revision procedures. However, comparison of the different types of revision procedures indicates that both components were more likely to be removed during a two-stage revision process than during a single-stage revision. This is to be expected since the majority of two-stage revisions are carried out for reasons of infection when all components are routinely removed.

NB: some figures in 2005 may not add up to the total number of procedures as not all fields were mandatory in MDSv2, the dataset in use at that time.

Report Viewer Configuration Error

The Report Viewer Web Control HTTP Handler has not been registered in the application's web.config file. Add <add verb="*" path="Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd" type = "Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91" /> to the system.web/httpHandlers section of the web.config file, or add <add name="ReportViewerWebControlHandler" preCondition="integratedMode" verb="*" path="Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd" type="Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91" /> to the system.webServer/handlers section for Internet Information Services 7 or later.

Browser not supported

Report Viewer requires a standards compliant browser. Users of Internet Explorer 8 and earlier should switch to a modern browser, or if already using a modern browser target standards mode by adding the <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge" > header tag to the host page.

Loading...
Cancel
PDF

Print

Cancel

Done

❌
Components removed during hip revision procedures in 2018
 
Hip single-stage revision
Hip stage one of two-stage revision
Hip excision arthroplasty
Debridement and implant retention (DAIR)
Total
 
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
Total
7,080
 
536
 
71
 
142
 
7,829
 
Both cup and stem
2,844
40%
435
81%
41
58%
2
1%
3,322
42%
Acetabular cup only
1,840
26%
11
2%
5
7%
5
4%
1,861
24%
Femoral stem only
1,537
22%
44
8%
17
24%
9
6%
1,607
21%
Neither cup nor stem
859
12%
46
9%
8
11%
126
89%
1,039
13%
© National Joint Registry 2019
 

Reporting Period

Date Range

Data to 31/12/2013

Data to 31/12/2014

Data to 31/12/2015

Data to 31/12/2016

Data to 31/12/2017

Data to 31/12/2018

Filter

Calendar Year

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Reset filters


Please set a value for all filters.

    © Copyright 2014 NJR